(Mis)Translating Deceit: Disinformation as a Translingual, Discursive Dynamic

New open access book on disinformation and liberal democracy 'Russia, Disinformation and the Liberal Order: RT as Populist Pariah' by Stephen Hutchings, Vera Tolz, Precious Chatterje-Doody, Rhys Crilley and Marie Gillespie is out in October 2024. It is based on first full analysis of RT, the Kremlin’s primary foreign propaganda tool.

Russia, Disinformation and the Liberal Order 

• interrogates and critiques commonplace notions of disinformation
• investigates the threat it poses to democracy via first systematic analysis of RT, the Kremlin’s primary foreign propaganda tool 
• illuminates wider communications strategies pursued by authoritarian states and grassroots populist movements
• reveals the interlinked nature of global media-politics pathologies
• argues that the challenge they pose requires reflection on liberalism's own blind spots, and a vigorous defence of open-minded impartiality

The book provides insights into RT's

• institutional culture, and journalistic ethos
• activities across multiple languages and media platforms
• audience-targeting strategies and audience engagement
• stance on Ukraine war and on Western responses to it
• reflexive relationship with pariah status reinforced by those responses

Download the book for free at Project Muse: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/123417

For the print version of the book, use the promo code 09BCARD at the publisher's website to get a 30% discount: https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501777639/russia-disinformation-and-the-liberal-order/#bookTabs=3

In the new open access article in the journal Cultural Studies, Stephen Hutchings constructively critiques the discourse practices of counter-disinformation units (CDUs). At the same time, he disavows bad-faith populist attacks on counter-disinformation as detrimental to ‘free speech’.

The activities of autocracies, conspiracists and other bad actors in the communications sphere represent a threat to democracies and their citizens. CDUs play a vital role in monitoring and combatting that threat. However, the rapid growth of counter-disinformation operations since 2016 has led to significant gaps, contradictions and inconsistencies in these practices. Specifically, Stephen highlights problems in the way that disinformation and linked phenomena are described and studied, and in how CDUs negotiate their relationship with democracy itself.

Applying critical discourse methods to the mission statements of key CDUs, he shows how they interweave three functions (identity, performativity, and representation) to articulate liberal democracy’s ‘discursive formation’, but in so doing, expose its fault lines. CDU failure to reconcile competing accounts of truth creates contradictions between liberal emphases on capitalist efficiency and the democratic prioritizing of popular power; dispassionate observation and civic participation; transparency and surveillance.

Stephen concludes that the absolutist epistemology (a remnant of the Cold War) designed to cover up these paradoxes masks the awkward relationship between truth and deception in politics generally. This epistemology hinders the emergence of alternative forms of knowledge capable of embracing truth in its full complexity and facilitating democratic renewal.

The article is available open access via this link: 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09502386.2024.2384942?src=#abstract

Stephen Hutchings authored Chapter 3 'The Holocaust and Russia’s Cinematic Go-Betweens: Cultural Diplomatic Internationalism or Covert Information Warfare?' in the book Alexander Rojavin and Helen Haft (ed.), Modern Russian Cinema as a Battleground in Russia's Information War (Routledge, 2024).

More information about the book here: https://www.routledge.com/Modern-Russian-Cinema-as-a-Battleground-in-Russias-Information-War/Rojavin-Haft/p/book/9781032398174

In a recently published open access article for the journal Slavica Tergestina vol. 31 (2023, no. II), Stephen Hutchings discusses the Channel ‘Russia-1’ Miniseries ‘The Optimists’, shown in two seasons in 2017 and 2021. The article analyses the miniseries to demonstrate how, even within the highly restricted authoritarian media environment that persists under Putin, television drama can play a subliminal political role in foregrounding modes of transculturation that bring Soviet and post-Soviet identities into productive dialogue with the Western Other against which they are habitually defined. This dialogue is conducted across several axes – temporal, spatial and representational – and navigates a complex and oscillating path between the value zones of diplomacy, patriotic/treacherous double agency, and cosmopolitan universalism. The framing context of the current war in Ukraine adds new relevance to the future potential of such phenomena to restore mutual engagement between Russia and a Western world from which it is presently alienated.

The article is available via this link: https://www.openstarts.units.it/entities/publication/63e6df73-d153-4fe7-9f29-bb1135ad23a9/details

Co-authored by Václav Štětka and Sabina Mihelj, this book provides the first systematic analysis of the role of the media in the rise of illiberalism, based on an original theoretical framework and extensive empirical research in Eastern Europe – a region that serves as a key battleground in the global advance of illiberalism. Liberal democracies across the world are facing a range of challenges, from the growing influence of illiberal leaders and parties to deepening polarization and declining trust in political elites and mainstream media. Although these developments attracted significant scholarly attention, the factors that contribute to the spreading of illiberalism remain poorly understood, and the communication perspective on illiberalism is particularly underdeveloped.

Štětka and Mihelj address this gap by introducing the concept of the illiberal public sphere, identifying the key stages in its development, and explaining what makes illiberalism distinct from related phenomena such as populism. Their analysis reveals how and why the changing communication environment facilitates selective exposure to ideologically and politically homogeneous sources, fosters changes in normative assumptions that guide media trust, increases vulnerability to disinformation, and goes hand in hand with growing hostility to immigration and LGBTQ+ rights. The findings challenge widespread assumptions about digital platforms as key channels of illiberalism and suggest that their role shifts as the illiberal sphere progresses.

The arguments presented in this book have important implications for future research on challenges to liberal democracy, as well as for journalists, media regulators and other professionals committed to rebuilding media trust and containing the forces of polarization.                 

The book is open access and is available here:

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-54489-7

In this article, co-authored with Andy Byford and Connor Doak, Stephen Hutchings revisits their co-edited volume Transnational Russian Studies (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2020) in light of the recent developments after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The article appeared online first in the journal Forum for Modern Language Studies. It is available via the link:
https://academic.oup.com/fmls/advance-article/doi/10.1093/fmls/cqae038/7685259?login=false

The article, co-authored by Anastasiya Pshenychnykh, Alena Pfoser, and Sabina Mihelj, appeared in the journal Social Media + Society online first. In the context of increasing conflicts over material heritage around the world, this article examines the role digital media play in battles over monuments. The rise of digital media brought significant changes to the cultural dynamics of heritage conflicts, which have not been adequately addressed in existing literature. Bringing together work on monuments, (digital) memory conflicts, and digital activism, we identify three key dimensions of monument battles in which the impact of digital media is most clearly visible: (a) participation, democratization, and deterritorialization; (b) reframing and contestation; and (c) mobilization and the online-offline movement of heritage battles. We illustrate these arguments drawing on a critical discourse analysis of monument battles on the messaging application Telegram in the context of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, using a sample of 940 posts from both pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian channels. We demonstrate that despite potentially providing space for alternative memory interpretations, online memory contestations over heritage contributed to the construction of polarized and mutually exclusive worlds.

The article is open access and available via the link:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20563051241242788

This short article, authored by Stephen Hutchings, appeared in the Russia Program Journal. It outlines some of the key ideas and ambitions of our project.

The article is available at: https://online.flippingbook.com/view/65937120/6/

This article by Vera Tolz and Stephen Hutchings offers a qualitative analysis of how, by adopting identity-related discourses whose meanings resonate within a given culture, Russian state propaganda strives to bolster “the truth status” of its Ukraine war claims. These discourses, we argue, have long historical lineages and thus are expected to be familiar to audiences. We identify three such discourses common in many contexts but with specific resonances in Russia, those of colonialism/decolonization, imperialism, and the imaginary West. The article demonstrates that these same discourses also inform war-related coverage in Russophone oppositional media. Russian state-affiliated and oppositional actors further share “floating signifiers,” particularly “the Russian people,” “historical Russia,” “the Russian world,” “Ukraine,” “fascism/Nazism,” and “genocide,” while according them radically different meanings. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of studying how state propaganda works at the level of discourses, and the acutely dialogical processes by which disinformation and counter-disinformation efforts are produced and consumed.

Available via Open Access at: 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1060586X.2023.2202581

The book by Stephen Hutchings presents a new perspective on how Russia projects itself to the world. Distancing itself from familiar, agency-driven International Relations accounts that focus on what ‘the Kremlin’ is up to and why, it argues for the need to pay attention to deeper, trans-state processes over which the Kremlin exerts much less control. Especially important in this context is mediatization, defined as the process by which contemporary social and political practices adopt a media form and follow media-driven logics. In particular, the book emphasizes the logic of the feedback loop or ‘recursion’, showing how it drives multiple Russian performances of national belonging and nation projection in the digital era. It applies this theory to recent issues, events, and scandals that have played out in international arenas ranging from television, through theatre, film, and performance art, to warfare. The first three chapters relate directly to disinformation.

For further details, see: https://www.routledge.com/Projecting-Russia-in-a-Mediatized-World-Recursive-Nationhood/Hutchings/p/book/9780367263904

This book is now available via Open Access at: https://www.routledge.com/Projecting-Russia-in-a-Mediatized-World-Recursive-Nationhood/Hutchings/p/book/9781032201221#

This short introductory piece, authored by Stephen Hutchings and Vera Tolz, appeared on the Modern Languages Research Blog hosted by the Institute for Advanced Study in London on October 6, 2021. It is available at: https://modernlanguagesresearch.blogs.sas.ac.uk/2021/10/06/mistranslating-deceit-disinformations-hidden-translingual-journey/

This brief introduction to the history of uses of the term, disinformation, was authored by Vera Tolz and Stephen Hutchings. It appeared on the LSE Politics Blog (Media@LSE Blog) on 10 August, 2021. It is available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2021/10/08/performing-disinformation-a-muddled-history-and-its-consequences/