(Mis)Translating Deceit: Disinformation as a Translingual, Discursive Dynamic

A 3-year AHRC-funded interdisciplinary research project aiming to develop a new, holistic approach to a key global challenge  (runs from October 2023 to October 2026; total value: £1million)

Our Project

By reconstructing disinformation's multiple border crossings - temporal, linguistic, cultural - (Mis)translating Deceit (MD) will re-orient existing approaches to disinformation. It will interrogate common misconceptions about disinformation, treating it as a translingual, historically mutating phenomenon forged within the sociopolitically contingent realm of discourse.

Learn More

Context

The Ukraine war, Covid-19 and the Trump presidency highlight the threat disinformation poses to democracy. Yet the implicit persistence of Cold War binaries – pitting democratic 'truth-telling' against totalitarian 'deceit', even in relation to homegrown disinformation – has seriously hampered attempts to counter this problem in the multipolar, Big Data age.

Learn More

Methods

We will employ a 5-stage methodological toolset focusing on a discourse analysis of seven specific disinformation campaigns assigned Russian/Soviet provenance by one of the world's leading counter-disinformation units. We will pay special attention to the dynamic linking 'disinformation narratives' and the conceptual apparatus applied to them by disinformation monitors.

Learn More
01

Rethink conceptual framework

By rethinking the conceptual framework in which disinformation is understood, to develop innovative qualitative methods for studying it as a translingual, historically contingent discourse, laying the grounds for a transformative new Critical Disinformation Studies (CDS)

02

Fill major gap in the field

Through the application of this new conceptual framework and methodology, to improve our understanding of the mutation of disinformation discourses and narratives over time and across lingua-cultural and geopolitical divides, filling a major gap in the field and correcting the hitherto monolingual bias in its coverage

03

Promote importance of Modern Languages research

To facilitate a Modern Languages-led interdisciplinary investigation of a major societal challenge, generating a CDS toolset that enhances the ability of modern linguists to address this challenge by incorporating methods from Cold War history, translation studies, audience research, media studies, security, and cybersecurity studies (including their policy dimensions) and discourse analysis

04

Carry out contemporary and Historical Case Studies

To carry out a range of detailed historical and contemporary case studies reconstructing the full dynamic in which the relationship between the calibration of narratives by their producers, their public acquisition of disinformation status and their reception by target audiences shifts as they travel from one lingua-cultural environment to another

05

Illuminate Russia's role as disinfo producer

To shed light on how Russia's perceived role as a producer and disseminator of disinformation past and present should be understood within a comparative context, how these historically shaped perceptions continue to inform wider understandings of disinformation, and how they have been reshaped by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine

06

Pioneer new model of knowledge production

To construct a pioneering model of collaborative knowledge generation in which academics, policy analysts and counter-disinformation practitioners tackle conceptual and methodological issues pertaining to the identification and countering of information-manipulation activities, and incorporating simulation models developed by Chatham House to test the efficacy of policy responses to disinformation in diverse local contexts

07

Support democratic integrity

To help stakeholders support democratic integrity, information resilience and good governance, improving their appreciation of the importance of the different lingua-cultural and historical contexts in which disinformation is produced and consumed, their tools for detecting manipulated information and their understanding of the relationship between counter-disinformation theory and practice, thus ensuring a more reflexive and dynamic approach to the problems at stake

08

Offer career development opportunities

To offer career development opportunities to early career researchers by inducting them into the project's intellectual networks, providing opportunities for publications, impact work and training, and building capacity in Language-Based Area Studies, Communication Studies, and Cold War History

09

Produce major outputs

To produce a co-authored monograph, a series of refereed journal articles for academic beneficiaries in media studies, history, translation studies, area studies and medical humanities, and a REF Impact Case Study.

10

Generate policy reports

To produce reports, co-authored with policy community members, for our non-academic collaborators and partners, including the WHO, the FCO, OFCOM and DCMS, summarizing the relevance of our findings and proposing transformative new approaches to countering disinformation which will bolster UK information resilience and deepen policymakers' understanding of a key threat to UK security.

How do definitions of disinformation change across time and geopolitical setting?

What role do cross-cultural mediations of the Cold War and post-communist transformation periods play in these mutations? What, if any, shared attributes do they manifest and how do we theorise them?

What do Soviet disinformation and reactions to it reveal about current disinformation and counter-disinformation activities?

Where then, and now, is their presumed deceit located, and with what implications: in their truth claims; their narrative frames; or their perpetrators’ self-representation?

What linguistic trajectories do disinformation narratives follow?

How are they adapted for different contexts and how well do they ‘translate’ for their audiences? What is the role of inter-state, translingual collusion in their generation? How does the perceived primacy of global English affect the dissemination, camouflaging and deconstruction of disinformation?

In what socio-political environments are these narratives rooted and how does this affect their formal attributes?

How are their truth statuses bolstered? How do communication strategies change across platforms and genres, and from digital to traditional media?

How are disinformation narratives appropriated by different audiences?

How are they used to draw Self/Other distinctions and how do they relate to different news sources and diets?

How do we develop policy responses that address the challenges posed by disinformation’s various mutations?

How might we test the efficacy of lingua-culturally calibrated counterdisinformation strategies? Can we account for their interaction with disinformation narratives?

Stephen Hutchings

Principle Investigator

Stephen Hutchings is Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Manchester and Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences.

Read More  

Vera Tolz

Lead Co-Investigator

Vera Tolz is Sir William Mather Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Manchester and Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences.

Read More  

Neil Sadler

Co-Investigator

Neil Sadler is Associate Professor of Translation Studies, University of Leeds.

Read More  

Sabina Mihelj

Co-Investigator

Sabina Mihelj is Professor of Media and Cultural Analysis at Loughborough University.

Read More  

Patricia Lewis

Co-Investigator

Dr Patricia Lewis is Research Director of Conflict, Science and Transformation and Director of the International Security Programme at Chatham House.

Read More  

Robert Yates

Co-Investigator

Rob Yates is the Executive Director of the Centre for Universal Health at Chatham House, and Director of its Global Health Programme.

Read More  

Nicolas Hénin

Project Consultant

Nicolas Hénin is an experienced French author and journalist who has covered numerous conflicts in Africa and the Middle East.

Read More  

Alexandr Voronovici

Research Associate

Alexandr Voronovici is a project research associate at the University of Manchester.

Read More  

Maxim Alyukov

Leverhulme Early-Career Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Manchester

Maxim joined the University of Manchester as a Leverhulme Early-Career Fellow in October 2023.

Read More  

Maksim Markelov

PhD Candidate

Under the supervision of Professors Stephen Hutchings and Vera Tolz at the University of Manchester, Maksim is carrying out research using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods for a PhD project entitled: 'Transforming Meaning: Russian Trolls in Social Media’s Changing Linguistic Landscape'.

Read More  

Natalie Hall

Postdoctoral researcher

Dr Natalie-Anne Hall is a postdoctoral research associate on the Everyday Misinformation Project at the Online Civic Culture Centre, Loughborough University.

Read More  

Job Alert! Post-Doctoral Position in Our Project

We are looking for a post-doctoral researcher to join our team and to work with our project's Co-I Professor Sabina Mihelj at Loughborough University.

Read More  
Counter-Disinformation: Problems and Potentials

In this blog, Stephen Hutchings introduces some of the key ideas of his new open access article in the journal Cultural Studies.

Read More  
“Sportswashing” as Disinformation. Part II:  How to Address the Audience Dimension to Sportswashing

The second part of a two-part blog post examining “sportswashing” as a form of disinformation, and reflecting on the role of audiences and the reception of “sportswashing” narratives.

Read More  
“Sportswashing” as Disinformation. Part I: The Power of “Spin” through Popular Sports Events

The first part of Vitaly Kazakov's two-part blog post examining “sportswashing” as a form of disinformation, and reflecting on the role of audiences and the reception of “sportswashing” narratives.

Read More  
Maksim Markelov Wins a Prize in the Poster Competition

Maksim Markelov wins the third prize with the poster 'How do State Trolls Manipulate Online Discourse?'

Read More  
Video Interview with Stephen Hutchings and Vera Tolz

Stephen Hutchings and Vera Tolz discuss our project in this video interview with Digital Futures network at the University of Manchester.

Read More  
Transnational Right-Wing Populism Online: Lessons from the Pro-Brexit Facebook Milieu

In her blog, Natalie-Anne Hall discusses the engagement of the pro-Brexit Facebook users with transnational right-wing populist discourses. The essay is based on Dr. Hall's recently published book 'Brexit, Facebook, and Transnational Right-Wing Populism' (Lexington Books, 2023).

Read More  
(Mis)Translating Deceit: A New Perspective on Disinformation

This blog gives a handy overview of our project. It is published on 'The Russia Program' website at George Washington University and is available at: https://therussiaprogram.org/page37253323.html

Read More  
Russia, Disinformation and the Liberal Order: RT as Populist Pariah

Russia, Disinformation and the Liberal Order: RT as Populist Pariah

Forthcoming with Cornell University Press in October 2024, new book on disinformation and liberal democracy 'Russia, Disinformation and the Liberal Order: RT as Populist Pariah', based on first full analysis of RT, the Kremlin’s primary foreign propaganda tool by Stephen Hutchings, Vera Tolz, Precious Chatterje-Doody, Rhys Crilley and Marie Gillespie.


Russia, Disinformation and the Liberal Order 

  • interrogates and critiques commonplace notions of disinformation
  • investigates the threat it poses to democracy via first systematic analysis of RT, the Kremlin’s primary foreign propaganda tool 
  • illuminates wider communications strategies pursued by authoritarian states and grassroots populist movements
  • reveals the interlinked nature of global media-politics pathologies
  • argues that the challenge they pose requires reflection on liberalism's own blind spots, and a vigorous defence of open-minded impartiality

The book provides insights into RT's

  • institutional culture, and journalistic ethos
  • activities across multiple languages and media platforms
  • audience-targeting strategies and audience engagement
  • stance on Ukraine war and on Western responses to it
  • reflexive relationship with pariah status reinforced by those responses


Use the promo code 09BCARD at the publisher's website to get a 30% discount: https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501777639/russia-disinformation-and-the-liberal-order/#bookTabs=3

Read More  
Uncovering the uncoverers: identity, performativity and representation in counter-disinformation discourse

Uncovering the uncoverers: identity, performativity and representation in counter-disinformation discourse

In the new open access article in the journal Cultural StudiesStephen Hutchings constructively critiques the discourse practices of counter-disinformation units (CDUs). At the same time, he disavows bad-faith populist attacks on counter-disinformation as detrimental to ‘free speech’.

The activities of autocracies, conspiracists and other bad actors in the communications sphere represent a threat to democracies and their citizens. CDUs play a vital role in monitoring and combatting that threat. However, the rapid growth of counter-disinformation operations since 2016 has led to significant gaps, contradictions and inconsistencies in these practices. Specifically, Stephen highlights problems in the way that disinformation and linked phenomena are described and studied, and in how CDUs negotiate their relationship with democracy itself.

Applying critical discourse methods to the mission statements of key CDUs, he shows how they interweave three functions (identity, performativity, and representation) to articulate liberal democracy’s ‘discursive formation’, but in so doing, expose its fault lines. CDU failure to reconcile competing accounts of truth creates contradictions between liberal emphases on capitalist efficiency and the democratic prioritizing of popular power; dispassionate observation and civic participation; transparency and surveillance.

Stephen concludes that the absolutist epistemology (a remnant of the Cold War) designed to cover up these paradoxes masks the awkward relationship between truth and deception in politics generally. This epistemology hinders the emergence of alternative forms of knowledge capable of embracing truth in its full complexity and facilitating democratic renewal.

The article is available open access via this link: 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09502386.2024.2384942?src=#abstract

Read More  
The Holocaust and Russia’s Cinematic Go-Betweens: Cultural Diplomatic Internationalism or Covert Information Warfare?

The Holocaust and Russia’s Cinematic Go-Betweens: Cultural Diplomatic Internationalism or Covert Information Warfare?

Stephen Hutchings authored Chapter 3 'The Holocaust and Russia’s Cinematic Go-Betweens: Cultural Diplomatic Internationalism or Covert Information Warfare?' in the book Alexander Rojavin and Helen Haft (ed.), Modern Russian Cinema as a Battleground in Russia's Information War (Routledge, 2024).
More information about the book here: https://www.routledge.com/Modern-Russian-Cinema-as-a-Battleground-in-Russias-Information-War/Rojavin-Haft/p/book/9781032398174

Read More  
Luminous Heroes for Dark Times: Transculturation, Cosmopolitanism, and the Go-Between as a Double Agent in Channel 'Russia-1' Minseries 'The Optimists'

Luminous Heroes for Dark Times: Transculturation, Cosmopolitanism, and the Go-Between as a Double Agent in Channel 'Russia-1' Minseries 'The Optimists'

In a recently published open access article for the journal Slavica Tergestina vol. 31 (2023, no. II), Stephen Hutchings discusses the Channel ‘Russia-1’ Miniseries ‘The Optimists’, shown in two seasons in 2017 and 2021. The article analyses the miniseries to demonstrate how, even within the highly restricted authoritarian media environment that persists under Putin, television drama can play a subliminal political role in foregrounding modes of transculturation that bring Soviet and post-Soviet identities into productive dialogue with the Western Other against which they are habitually defined. This dialogue is conducted across several axes – temporal, spatial and representational – and navigates a complex and oscillating path between the value zones of diplomacy, patriotic/treacherous double agency, and cosmopolitan universalism. The framing context of the current war in Ukraine adds new relevance to the future potential of such phenomena to restore mutual engagement between Russia and a Western world from which it is presently alienated.

The article is available via this link: https://www.openstarts.units.it/entities/publication/63e6df73-d153-4fe7-9f29-bb1135ad23a9/details

Read More  
The Illiberal Public Sphere: Media in Polarized Societies

The Illiberal Public Sphere: Media in Polarized Societies

Co-authored by Václav Štětka and Sabina Mihelj, this book provides the first systematic analysis of the role of the media in the rise of illiberalism, based on an original theoretical framework and extensive empirical research in Eastern Europe – a region that serves as a key battleground in the global advance of illiberalism. Liberal democracies across the world are facing a range of challenges, from the growing influence of illiberal leaders and parties to deepening polarization and declining trust in political elites and mainstream media. Although these developments attracted significant scholarly attention, the factors that contribute to the spreading of illiberalism remain poorly understood, and the communication perspective on illiberalism is particularly underdeveloped.

Štětka and Mihelj address this gap by introducing the concept of the illiberal public sphere, identifying the key stages in its development, and explaining what makes illiberalism distinct from related phenomena such as populism. Their analysis reveals how and why the changing communication environment facilitates selective exposure to ideologically and politically homogeneous sources, fosters changes in normative assumptions that guide media trust, increases vulnerability to disinformation, and goes hand in hand with growing hostility to immigration and LGBTQ+ rights. The findings challenge widespread assumptions about digital platforms as key channels of illiberalism and suggest that their role shifts as the illiberal sphere progresses.

The arguments presented in this book have important implications for future research on challenges to liberal democracy, as well as for journalists, media regulators and other professionals committed to rebuilding media trust and containing the forces of polarization.                 

The book is open access and is available here:

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-54489-7

Read More  
Decolonizing the Transnational, Transnationalizing the Decolonial: Russian Studies at the Crossroads

Decolonizing the Transnational, Transnationalizing the Decolonial: Russian Studies at the Crossroads

In this article, co-authored with Andy Byford and Connor Doak, Stephen Hutchings revisits their co-edited volume Transnational Russian Studies (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2020) in light of the recent developments after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The article appeared online first in the journal Forum for Modern Language Studies. It is available via the link:
https://academic.oup.com/fmls/advance-article/doi/10.1093/fmls/cqae038/7685259?login=false

Read More  
When Monument Battles Go Digital: Russian–Ukrainian Conflicts over Material Heritage on Telegram

When Monument Battles Go Digital: Russian–Ukrainian Conflicts over Material Heritage on Telegram

The article, co-authored by Anastasiya Pshenychnykh, Alena Pfoser, and Sabina Mihelj, appeared in the journal Social Media + Society online first. In the context of increasing conflicts over material heritage around the world, this article examines the role digital media play in battles over monuments. The rise of digital media brought significant changes to the cultural dynamics of heritage conflicts, which have not been adequately addressed in existing literature. Bringing together work on monuments, (digital) memory conflicts, and digital activism, we identify three key dimensions of monument battles in which the impact of digital media is most clearly visible: (a) participation, democratization, and deterritorialization; (b) reframing and contestation; and (c) mobilization and the online-offline movement of heritage battles. We illustrate these arguments drawing on a critical discourse analysis of monument battles on the messaging application Telegram in the context of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, using a sample of 940 posts from both pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian channels. We demonstrate that despite potentially providing space for alternative memory interpretations, online memory contestations over heritage contributed to the construction of polarized and mutually exclusive worlds.

The article is open access and available via the link:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20563051241242788

Read More  
(Mis)Translating Deceit: A New Perspective on Disinformation

(Mis)Translating Deceit: A New Perspective on Disinformation

This short article, authored by Stephen Hutchings, appeared in the Russia Program Journal. It outlines some of the key ideas and ambitions of our project.

The article is available at: https://online.flippingbook.com/view/65937120/6/

Read More  
'Truth with a Z: disinformation, war in Ukraine, and Russia’s contradictory discourse of imperial identity'

'Truth with a Z: disinformation, war in Ukraine, and Russia’s contradictory discourse of imperial identity'

This article by Vera Tolz and Stephen Hutchings offers a qualitative analysis of how, by adopting identity-related discourses whose meanings resonate within a given culture, Russian state propaganda strives to bolster “the truth status” of its Ukraine war claims. These discourses, we argue, have long historical lineages and thus are expected to be familiar to audiences. We identify three such discourses common in many contexts but with specific resonances in Russia, those of colonialism/decolonization, imperialism, and the imaginary West. The article demonstrates that these same discourses also inform war-related coverage in Russophone oppositional media. Russian state-affiliated and oppositional actors further share “floating signifiers,” particularly “the Russian people,” “historical Russia,” “the Russian world,” “Ukraine,” “fascism/Nazism,” and “genocide,” while according them radically different meanings. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of studying how state propaganda works at the level of discourses, and the acutely dialogical processes by which disinformation and counter-disinformation efforts are produced and consumed.

Available via Open Access at: 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1060586X.2023.2202581

Read More  
Projecting Russia in a Mediatized World: Recursive Nationhood

Projecting Russia in a Mediatized World: Recursive Nationhood

The book by Stephen Hutchings presents a new perspective on how Russia projects itself to the world. Distancing itself from familiar, agency-driven International Relations accounts that focus on what ‘the Kremlin’ is up to and why, it argues for the need to pay attention to deeper, trans-state processes over which the Kremlin exerts much less control. Especially important in this context is mediatization, defined as the process by which contemporary social and political practices adopt a media form and follow media-driven logics. In particular, the book emphasizes the logic of the feedback loop or ‘recursion’, showing how it drives multiple Russian performances of national belonging and nation projection in the digital era. It applies this theory to recent issues, events, and scandals that have played out in international arenas ranging from television, through theatre, film, and performance art, to warfare. The first three chapters relate directly to disinformation.


For further details, see: https://www.routledge.com/Projecting-Russia-in-a-Mediatized-World-Recursive-Nationhood/Hutchings/p/book/9780367263904

This book is now available via Open Access at: https://www.routledge.com/Projecting-Russia-in-a-Mediatized-World-Recursive-Nationhood/Hutchings/p/book/9781032201221#

Read More  
‘(Mis)Translating Deceit: Disinformation’s Hidden Translingual, Journey’

‘(Mis)Translating Deceit: Disinformation’s Hidden Translingual, Journey’

This short introductory piece, authored by Stephen Hutchings and Vera Tolz, appeared on the Modern Languages Research Blog hosted by the Institute for Advanced Study in London on October 6, 2021. It is available at: https://modernlanguagesresearch.blogs.sas.ac.uk/2021/10/06/mistranslating-deceit-disinformations-hidden-translingual-journey/

Read More  
‘Performing Disinformation: a Muddled History and its Consequences’

‘Performing Disinformation: a Muddled History and its Consequences’

This brief introduction to the history of uses of the term, disinformation, was authored by Vera Tolz and Stephen Hutchings. It appeared on the LSE Politics Blog (Media@LSE Blog) on 10 August, 2021. It is available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2021/10/08/performing-disinformation-a-muddled-history-and-its-consequences/

Read More  
 

Data sets

Our project will generate various datasets relating to our work on disinformation. These may be of use to other researchers

 

Reports

We are planning to co-produce various short reports summarising our findings, but aimed at the policy-making community and/or a wider general audience. They are available here.

 

Media

We hope to make available links to online media resources relevant to our research interests. They will be found here

Bibliography

Bibliography

Over the course of our project we will build an extensive bibliography capturing other useful research items dealing with those aspects of disinformation of interest to us. It will be available here